Being held against your will on mental-health grounds is one of the most serious things a government can do to a person. This statute makes it a decision for evidence and a judge — not for anyone's opinion, discomfort, or say-so. Real protection for people in crisis, and a hard limit on the power to detain.
In many places, a person could be taken in and held on little more than another's assertion — an official's, an institution's, sometimes a family member's.Check it
Disagreeing with an assessment, refusing voluntary treatment, holding unusual beliefs, or simply not conforming could be treated as reason enough.Check it
The person initiating the hold could also be the one certifying it, and emergency holds could stretch on with no firm limit and no prompt hearing.Check it
Liberty could be taken by administrative order — without a lawyer, without seeing the evidence, without a judge.Check it
No involuntary hold without specific, articulable evidence of genuine, serious danger or a real inability to meet basic survival needs — never mere opinion or nonconformity.
The person who starts a hold can't be the one who certifies it. An independent licensed professional, with no stake in the outcome, makes that call.
Emergency holds are capped at 72 hours. Past that, the person goes free unless the grounds are certified and a hearing is set.
Any hold beyond the emergency period needs a hearing before a neutral judge — with counsel (free if needed), the right to see and challenge the evidence, and the government carrying a clear-and-convincing burden.
Unusual beliefs, refusing treatment, or "not recognizing your condition" could be treated as the justification — no proof of actual danger required.Check it
Only specific, articulable evidence of serious, demonstrable danger — to self or others — or a genuine inability to meet basic survival needs. Disagreement and nonconformity are never, by themselves, the evidence.
The same person or institution that wanted the hold could also certify its grounds — judge and prosecutor in one.Check it
No self-certification. An independent, licensed professional with no financial or personal stake — not the party requesting the hold — determines whether the evidence meets the threshold.
Emergency holds could extend with no firm ceiling, and the passage of time itself became a reason to keep someone detained.Check it
A hard 72-hour cap before the independent exam and hearing. When it expires, the person is released unless the grounds are certified and a hearing is set. Time is never itself a ground to keep holding someone.
Liberty could be taken by administrative order or private action — often with no lawyer, no notice of the evidence, no chance to challenge it.Check it
Any hold past the emergency period is a judicial act: a prompt hearing before a neutral judge, the right to be present, counsel at public expense, notice of the evidence, the right to confront it, and an independent evaluation if you can't afford one.
Once detained, a person could face far more confinement and control than their actual situation required.Check it
Any intervention must use the least restrictive means that meets the genuine need — protection and care, not control for its own sake.
This is the plain-language version. The binding text is CS-38, which implements Right 51 of the Constitution.
This is your country’s law. Help shape the next draft of it.
